Skip to content

Online reputation management

Our ORM services establish truthful work with public mentions and route each case to the person responsible. Online reputation management starts with monitoring and ends with changes to company processes, so that reviews, maps, discussions and AI answers about the brand rest on facts.

Why reputation affects sales

Customers often choose a company before visiting its website. Search results and maps show a rating and review count next to the name, and with similar offers people open the one rated higher. The next filter is reading reviews: if recent complaints go unanswered, buyers leave even when the price and terms suited them. The newest filter is an assistant’s answer, which many people trust as neutral advice. Online reputation repair works on all three points because it deals with the source of ratings rather than advertising on top of them. What people see when they search for the company name is covered by SERM.

Monitoring with context

We collect public brand mentions and sort them by platform, topic, date, and case type. Count alone is not enough: a response needs facts such as order history, correspondence, service terms, or steps already taken. This separates a question, an error, and a genuine complaint.

Routing cases

Marketing should not write every reply. Each case type needs a route to support, an account manager, a product specialist, or legal review. An agreed response time and tone are more useful than a stock comment because public communication must reflect a real resolution.

Working with platforms

A publication can only be challenged when there is a substantiated rule breach or factual error. We do not create fabricated reviews, disguise problems, or promise removal of honest negative experience. Durable reputation comes from accurate responses, process correction, and transparent information.

How AI answers describe your brand

Questions such as “is this company reliable” are increasingly answered by an assistant: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Yandex Alice AI and others. A model does not form its own opinion; it retells what it finds in reviews, map listings, discussions, articles and the company website. If old unanswered complaints or outdated details dominate those sources, the assistant repeats them. That is why mention monitoring now covers AI answers too, and review management covers the sources they draw on. The technical side is handled by generative engine optimisation.

  • We regularly ask assistants about the company and save their answers with sources and dates.
  • Map and platform listings are kept current: addresses, opening hours, services and replies to reviews.
  • The website publishes verifiable company facts: terms, returns and warranty procedures, contacts.
  • Reviews get factual replies, because a reply with facts becomes part of the source a model draws on.

Industries where ORM matters most

Every business needs to work with reviews, but in some markets an unanswered complaint is especially costly: high prices, long decisions or choices made on recommendation.

Online shops and marketplaces

Seller ratings and product reviews directly affect choice, and the flow of reviews is large. Fast replies with order facts are needed, along with analysis of recurring complaints about delivery, packaging or quality.

Healthcare

Patients choose clinics and doctors by reviews, while medical confidentiality limits how much a reply can say. The rules must allow a substantive answer without disclosing patient data.

Financial services

Banks, insurers and financial services receive many emotional reviews, and an inaccurate public reply can become a legal risk. Replies are fact-checked and approved by the company’s lawyer.

Property developers

Home buyers study a developer at length: completion dates, build quality, the management company. It matters to reply in residents’ discussions and keep construction progress up to date on the website.

B2B with long sales cycles

Clients vet a supplier before a tender or contract: publications, industry discussions and employee reviews. Accurate company information and careful handling of employer reviews matter most here.

What the work includes

Online reputation management covers monitoring, work with reviews on platforms, and response setup inside the company. The scope depends on where the company is discussed: maps and marketplaces for retail, review sites and professional communities for services.

  • Mention monitoring setup: review platforms, maps, social networks, forums, marketplaces.
  • Case classification by platform, topic, sentiment, and type: question, error, complaint.
  • Response rules: who replies, within what timeframe, in what tone, and with which facts.
  • Official review responses prepared with in-company fact checking.
  • Verification and completion of company profiles on review platforms and maps.
  • Platform requests where a rule breach or factual error can be substantiated.
  • Honest review collection: a request mechanism for real customers after a service.
  • Feedback into processes: which complaints recur and what needs fixing.

What we need from you

Reputation work is impossible without the company’s involvement: we need facts and responsible people. Without facts on specific situations a reply becomes generic, and readers do not accept generic replies.

  • Access to company profiles on review platforms and maps, or their creation together with you.
  • Contacts for responsible people: support, managers, product, legal review.
  • Access to order or case history to check facts behind specific reviews.
  • An agreed communication tone and constraints: what can and cannot be disclosed publicly.
  • A list of platforms and queries that matter most.
  • Details of any previous attempts to work on reputation, if there were any.

What you get

You receive configured monitoring with mention classification, routing and response rules with templates for typical situations, completed and verified platform profiles, and prepared official responses to accumulated reviews. A regular report records new mentions, handled cases, platform requests, and recurring causes of negative feedback worth fixing in processes.

Documents

Routing and response rules with owners and response times, response templates for typical situations that require facts to be inserted, and instructions for collecting customer reviews. The rules are designed for your team and do not require our involvement in every reply.

Implemented changes

Configured monitoring, completed and verified profiles on platforms and maps, published official responses to accumulated reviews, and submitted platform requests. Profiles are completed from company data, without embellishment.

Regular report

New mentions by platform and topic, handled cases and reaction time, platform request status, and a list of recurring causes of negative feedback with process recommendations. The report can be shown to management without further explanation.

How the work is organised

  1. Step 1

    We collect mentions across platforms and queries, classify them, and assess the current reputation state.

  2. Step 2

    We agree the rules: case routes by type, responsible people, reaction times, and the tone of public replies.

  3. Step 3

    We verify company profiles on platforms and maps and prepare fact-checked responses to accumulated reviews.

  4. Step 4

    We launch regular monitoring, handling of new cases under the rules, and honest review collection from customers.

  5. Step 5

    We deliver regular reports and process recommendations for recurring complaints.

Scope and estimate

The scope of online reputation management is driven by the number of platforms and profiles, the volume of accumulated reviews, the flow of new mentions, and how involved the company is in preparing responses. Platform requests with an evidence base and review collection setup are considered separately. The task list is fixed after the initial mention collection. Companies with many branches or map locations are estimated separately because of the volume of profiles.

Discuss the task

Frequently asked questions

Who replies to a customer?

It depends on the case: support handles an order, the product team handles service behaviour, and an account manager handles agreements. Confirmed facts and an agreed tone matter more than one script.

Can negative content be removed?

Only where there is a substantiated platform-rule breach or factual error. Honest negative experience is not removed artificially; it receives a real reply and, when needed, process correction.

How long does it take to push negative results down?

Monitoring and response rules are set up quickly, but a shift in perception and in search results takes time: it depends on new reviews, real changes in service and how search engines re-evaluate pages. There is no fixed timeline, so the work is ongoing. The first visible effect is the speed and quality of replies, not a change in ratings.

How does ORM differ from SERM?

ORM works with all public mentions: reviews, comments, and discussions on platforms, regardless of search. SERM focuses on what a searcher sees in results for brand queries. ORM is usually the source of facts and responses that SERM then makes visible. Both services can run together when branded results are shaped mainly by reviews.

How are positive reviews collected?

By asking real customers after a service: via a link, an email, or a messenger, with no reward for a rating and no pressure. Reviews must be honest, otherwise platforms remove them and the company risks its reputation more than from negative feedback. The request mechanism is built into your service process so it works without our involvement.

What about fake negative reviews?

Gather evidence: no matching order, templated wording, abnormal activity. Then contact the platform through its official procedure with the facts. In parallel, reply publicly, calmly, and to the point so readers see the company’s position. We do not use templated replies to fake negative reviews: every case is answered on the facts.

Can a negative article be removed from Google completely?

Only when it contains a provable breach: defamation, false facts or a violation of platform rules. In that case we help gather evidence for a request to the platform or a court. An honest article cannot be removed; it is answered with a public reply and accurate alternative sources.

Is the work confidential?

Internal facts, correspondence and access are used only to prepare replies and requests. Public texts are published in the company’s name and only after your approval. Any special confidentiality requirements are discussed before work starts.

How can we help?
Discuss a project